Commentary on the Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 21 July 2020 in the Case of Velkov v. Bulgaria (Accumulation of Proceedings Concerning Penal Responsibility for the Same Act)
Czasopismo Prawa Karnego i Nauk Penalnych Rok XXV: 2021, numer 1
Journal of Criminal Law and Penal Studies Volume XXV: 2021, No. 1
Anna Błachnio-Parzych – habilitated doctor, Kozminski University in Warsaw; ORCID: 0000-0002-2392-3479; e-mail: email@example.com.
Full text in PDF (open access)
ne bis in idem, cumulation of penal proceedings, European Court of Human Rights, cumulation of penal responsibility, integrated mixed proceedings
The judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Velkov v. Bulgaria case regards the accumulation of proceedings concerning penal responsibility for the same act. If there is ”a sufficiently close connection in substance and time” between such proceedings, they are treated as integrated ”mixed” proceedings. Th e criteria for the assessment of those connections between proceedings were formulated in the judgment in A and B v. Norway case. This judgment was met with fair criticism, which was mainly due to the imprecise nature of the given criteria. However, the judgment in Velkov v. Bulgaria case demonstrates that the adoption of these criteria does not mean that the accumulation of penal responsibility for the same act is generally permissible, and a careful examination of the connections between proceedings from the perspective of the above-mentioned criteria may lead to the assessment of the accumulation as inad-missible in the light of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
Caianiello M., You can’t always counterbalance what you want, European Journal of Crime, „Criminal law and Criminal Justice” 2017, nr 25.
Hofmański P., w: Konwencja o Ochronie Praw Człowieka i Podstawowych Wolności. Tom II. Komentarz do artykułów 19–59 oraz Protokołów dodatkowych, red. L. Gar-licki, Warszawa 2011.
Ligeti K., Tosza S., Challenges and Trends in Enforcing Economic and Financial Crime: Criminal Law and Alternatives in Europe and the US, w: White Collar Crime: A Com-parative Perspective, red. K. Ligeti, S. Tosza, Oxford 2019.
Luchtman M., The ECJ’s Recent Case Law on Ne Bis in Idem: Implications for Law En-forcement in a Shared Legal Order, „Common Market Law Review” 2018, vol. 55.
Mirandola G., Lasagni S., Th e European ne bis in idem at the Crossroads of Administrative and Criminal Law, „EUCRIM. The European Criminal Law Associations’ Forum” 2019, nr 2.
Szwarc M., Łączne zastosowanie sankcji administracyjnych i karnych w ś wietle zasady ne bis in idem (uwagi na tle orzecznictwa ETPC), „Państwo i Prawo” 2017, nr 12.